Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#1119 closed defect
Misleading pseudobond at RNA chain break in mmCIF 5an9 — at Version 3
| Reported by: | Tristan Croll | Owned by: | Greg Couch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Input/Output | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
| Notify when closed: | Platform: | all | |
| Project: | ChimeraX |
Description (last modified by )
Opening 5an9, residues N2700 and N2925 (the 3' and 5' sides of a chain break) are messed up. The pseudobond across the break goes from the O3' atom of N2700 to O3' of N2925.
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
| Component: | Core → Input/Output |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from to |
| Summary: | Erroneous bonding at RNA chain break in 5an9 → Erroneous bonding at RNA chain break in mmCIF 5an9 |
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
The mmCIF reader tries to generate a pseudobond connecting the linking atoms of N2700 and N2925. Unfortunately, N2925 is missing the P, so the pseudobond is connecting to the closest atom. A possible solution would be to use the residue template to find the closest existing atom to the P to connect the psuedobond to.
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Summary: | Erroneous bonding at RNA chain break in mmCIF 5an9 → Misleading pseudobond at RNA chain break in mmCIF 5an9 |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
The problem description most closely matches the behavior of the mmCIF version of 5an9, though the current daily build does correctly bond N2925-26 (the pseudobond is nonetheless still wonky). The PDB version has different incorrect behavior, so I will open a separate ticket for that since Greg handles mmCIF and I do PDB.
--Eric