Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #3891, comment 9
- Timestamp:
- Nov 3, 2020, 3:16:30 PM (5 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #3891, comment 9
v1 v2 1 Notice that while the command-line gzip compression took 5.4 seconds, the gzip session compression in ChimeraX took 14 seconds (= 22.51 - 8.36). Not clear why the Python gzip is slower. Possibly gzip uses multiple threads when compressing a file but only a single thread when compressing a stream. Or maybe compression level or thread usesdefaults are different between the command-line gzip and ChimeraX use of Python GzipFile(). At any rate, the command-line timings don't necessarily reflect speed of ChimeraX doing the compression so I will need to test the compression methods in ChimeraX on the stream.1 Notice that while the command-line gzip compression took 5.4 seconds, the gzip session compression in ChimeraX took 14 seconds (= 22.51 - 8.36). Not clear why the Python gzip is slower. Possibly gzip uses multiple threads when compressing a file but only a single thread when compressing a stream. Or maybe compression level or number of thread defaults are different between the command-line gzip and ChimeraX use of Python GzipFile(). At any rate, the command-line timings don't necessarily reflect speed of ChimeraX doing the compression so I will need to test the compression methods in ChimeraX on the stream.