Changes between Version 29 and Version 30 of NeteSOW

Timestamp:

Oct 22, 2020, 2:18:37 PM (5 years ago)

Author:

Elaine Meng

Comment:

--

NeteSOW

@@ -119 +119 @@
 NIH 3D pipeline:
 
-- Working on converting their scripts to ChimeraX
- - Joined github repository for scripts set up by Philip; it  seems that 2-factor authentication will not be a problem for our day-to-day work
- - Got 3 scripts from Phil Cruz
- - Eric: only few issues with the 2 shorter scripts
-    - ChimeraX does not write VRML; not absolute requirement, can convert glb to vrml in separate step
-    - ChimeraX "graphics quality" can be used to adjust numbers of triangles for STL output
-    - no incremental radius adjustment a la Chimera vdwdefine plus/minus; Eric will supply python to do this 
+- Working on converting workflow to ChimeraX
+- Got 3 scripts from Phil Cruz 
+- Joined github repository for scripts set up by Philip; it  seems that 2-factor authentication will not be a problem for our day-to-day work
+- Eric: only few issues with the 2 shorter scripts
+  - ChimeraX does not write VRML; not absolute requirement, can convert glb to vrml in separate step
+  - ChimeraX "graphics quality" can be used to adjust numbers of triangles for STL output
+  - no incremental radius adjustment a la Chimera vdwdefine plus/minus; Eric will supply python to do this 
     - no combine, why was it used?  Phil: to handle biological assemblies that were multiple models.  Eric: now the fetch gets the assemblies as single models
  - Philip asks about taking all the file reading and branching out of the ChimeraX scripts and instead have several separate ChimeraX scripts that are called; however, parsing with ChimeraX has several advantages
@@ -131 +131 @@
  - Darrell: how about also combining with volume script, have ChimeraX identify if upload is map?  Eric: should be doable, at least if filename has standard suffix
  - Darrell: will also need to distinguish which database goes with an identifier for fetch purposes
- - Phil: if REST, is a hybrid approach possible? 
+ - Tom: maybe run ChimeraX once to assess content, send feedback/questions to user, then run ChimeraX again for the processing
+ - Phil: if REST, is a hybrid approach possible? Could just do via REST without having to run ChimeraX twice
  - Eric has improved error reporting in JSON